(Updates with comment from Cameron in eighth paragraph).
April 20 (Bloomberg)--material prevention eruption by Cameron International Corp. was a cause "in whole or in part" of the eruption of the Macondo well and oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico last year, BP Plc, said in a filing of Cour.Conception of Cameron and the manufacture of the Eruption "used on the deepwater Horizon."", and Cameron maintenance and modification of the balance of payments, does not meet the standards of a reasonable manufacturer and service provider," BP said today in a filing in Federal Court in New Orleans. The Eruption "failed to work properly when necessary and has been excessively dangerous when used as intended."BP seeks damages of Cameron to provide an allegedly defective product, and contributions for any sum of money that the oil company has to pay for claims under the Oil Pollution Act, the company said in the filing. BP said that it is committed to pay all legitimate claims while reserving the right to collect Cameron or other responsible parties.The Macondo well skip one year ago today, triggering the worst offshore oil spill in the history of the United States and leading to hundreds of lawsuits against BP and its partners and entrepreneurs. Filing of today came a series of complaints and applications by counterclaim by the plaintiffs and defendants meeting a time limit fixed by the judge of the New Orleans, oversee the combinations.The prosecution also appoint as platform of defendants Transocean Ltd., which owned the Deepwater Horizon, Halliburton Corp., which provided the cementation of services and partners of minority of BP in wells, Anadarko Petroleum Corp., and Mitsui & Co. Unit Moex Offshore LLC. U.S. District Judge Carl Barbier planned for February 2012 nonjury trial to determine fault.Oil, gas SurgeCameron in deposits of Court said last week that the explosion was not his fault because the oil and gas were already surging to the platform when the workers tried to activate the eruption-prevention equipment for sealing the well. "Hydrocarbons entered the riser long before the crew attempted to activate the BOP and even a fully functional BOP could not prevent explosions," Cameron said in its filing on April 15.Continuing businesses on the spill of applicants have claimed Houston-based BOP Cameron was not designed to handle the extreme environment and thicker drilling pipes in any wells as the deepwater horizon was drilling for BP in the Gulf of Mexico. BP claims the Eruption was poorly designed and unable to work as expected. "Today, it is the date limit under the relevant statue for all parties to file claims against the other,"Rhonda Barnat, a spokesman for Cameron, said in an e-mail. "It is not surprising that companies are filing to protect their benefit rights."Cameron has also filed claims to "protect ourselves", she said.The case is in Re: oil spill Oil Rig Deepwater Horizon in the Gulf of the Mexico, April 20, 2010, MDL-2179, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana (New Orleans).-With the help of Laurel Brubaker Calkins in Houston. Editors: Andrew Dunn, Peter Blumberg
To contact the reporters on this story: Margaret Cronin Fisk in Southfield, Michigan, at mcfisk@bloomberg.net; Allen Johnson Jr. in New Orleans at allenmct@gmail.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Michael Hytha to the mhytha@bloomberg.net
没有评论:
发表评论